I`m a composer... is it ok if I add you to my msn buddylist?

I love composing, I`ve tried out the blues on the piano and saxaphone, I`ve also been composing on the flute for years, since I was 10!
By the sound of it, you`ve been composing alot 2! I think that`s great

Dave- go ahead and add me.
I finally worked out where my train of thought was going with regards to atonality. My definition of atonality is "music that is not tonal", that is, it doesn`t fit into the major/minor key system (and possibly into the modes, because I wouldn`t call modal music "atonal"). By this definition, there is plently of atonal music around.

Hey you all sound great composers! I really need all you talented people to help me, me and my friend are doing a duet and we need a suitable piece! Could some one please donate one of their pieces to be played at a public concert!
Thanks
(We of about grade 6 standard!)

SERIALISTS ONLY NEED AN EXCUSE TO PLAY THE SONORIC FREQUENCY AS A WHOLE SO THEY TRY TO GRASP THINGS THAT HAVE NO COHESION BETWEEN THEM,FALACIOUS THEORY OR SIMPLY LACK OF TONAL CREATIVITY...tonal music is limited only by the anticipations of our ears;thirds,sixth....bla,bla,but if you begin by suggesting sounds a little less fit and at the same time sporadicaly refer to a chord you obtain something found in no modes,no concept, no far out theories.of course tonal music is predictable and precice,but hey!! it`s weakness is it`s srtengh and that`s why the second mouvement of the pathetique will still be remembered in 400 years.i doubt that schonberg and his desperate followers will live that long.of course music will become more and more complex,transgressing every rules,well maybe because there are actually no rules.you impose novelty by creating without bounds. you don`t need any theoricians to justify sounds.if they knew how to make music they would have done so and be immortal by now.

Daisy- what instruments, what length?