| 
| 
Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   22:53 on Thursday, August 18, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (Taylor F.) | 
 It looks like i`m going to be choosing between these three bassoons pretty soon. Which of these three would you think would be the best for a semi-profesional college orchestra or i guess just in general 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   12:40 on Friday, August 19, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (a little birdie) | 
 the Renard 222 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   13:09 on Friday, August 19, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (martin) | 
 The Moosmann. I played a Schreiber S16 for a few years in the past. Reliable. I once played a Fox: A good instrument, but I don`t like it. Now I am playing a Moosmann: Really amazing for the money! 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   22:07 on Friday, August 19, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (Taylor U.) | 
 I have a Schrieber and would recomend either the Schrieber or the Moosman, The more german the better in my opinion. 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   12:49 on Saturday, August 20, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (fred) | 
 try and get the moosmann 150....i play a 200, my friend plays a 150, and they really are worth the extra money, because the question you have to ask yourself is, how long do you want to wait before you get a new instrument. in a semi professional setting, the moosmann 100 will last you 2 - 3 years, no more, you will have to upgrade, but the moosmann150 will last you a long time, my friend will see hiself playing it for a good 5 - 10 years to come 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   16:33 on Tuesday, August 23, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (Taylor F.) | 
 actually i just put in an order for a bassoon and it will be coming in the mail this friday. Which bassoon you may be wondering. actually it was none of the above
 It was......
 
 Fox/Renard 220
 
 I basically had the choice of the Fox 220 or the schreiber 5016. I used to take private lessons from a bassoon specialist/maintenence and repair technician and he told me the fox 220 would be better than the schreiber. Hopefully I made the right choice but i`m confident in it because of my old bassoon teacher. He played in the beijing symphony for years and has basically dedicated his life to bassoon so i`m assuming he knows quite a bit about this
 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   09:52 on Thursday, August 25, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (fred) | 
 yeah....thats a really good bassoon, steady as a rock...its also good cos you can ship it back to Alan Fox over in indiana for services...as opposed to a german bassoon....good luck with it 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   16:37 on Friday, August 26, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
|  | 
	
| 
| 
Re: Schreiber s16, moosman 100 or Renard 222 
 
   11:57 on Thursday, September 15, 2005
 
          
 |  | 
| 
|  |  
| (Jamie) | 
 You need to polish those finger prints off that beautiful bassoon!! :-)
 *gets old beat up Renard 41 out and looks at your bassoon...jealous*
 
 
 | 
 |  |  | 
|  |