Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   06:30 on Friday, March 17, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   19:39 on Thursday, April 6, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   21:56 on Friday, April 7, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   19:13 on Tuesday, April 11, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   14:04 on Thursday, April 13, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   08:11 on Sunday, April 16, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   21:19 on Friday, April 21, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   07:42 on Monday, April 24, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   11:29 on Tuesday, April 25, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   08:21 on Wednesday, August 23, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   19:40 on Wednesday, August 23, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
  | 
  
  Penny (218 points) 
  | 
  
I have a problem with remembering names so even if I did have a favorite guitarist I wouldn't know how to tell you who it was. Though alot of these names are very familiar. 
My opinion of a good guitarist: A talented guitarist should be both a composer and a musician, this means they should be able to play songs written by other people along with their own. They should be able to play both mechanical(the difficuly of the chords and struming)and techical(the difficulty of the rhythm) pieces.
 
It  is fascinating to see someone play an impossibly fast piece, but generally those songs are going too fast to fit in alot of rhythmic changes(nothing wrong with that it's normal for alot of fast peices, just look at "Flight of the Bubblebee"). But with slower peices its always best to have rhythmic challenges, otherwise it would be very boring without the speed to keep you attached.
 
Good musicians and composers should have both of these.
 
If someone plays at an impossibly high speed  and alot of rhythmic changes, I will definitly buy a recording.
 
Before I start getting chewed out, I didn't say ALL fast pieces have a basic rhythm. Or that ALL slow peices are boring without them, I was just giving an example of a Mechanical song vs. a Technical song.   
I'm aware that there are guitarist that can do both, that why they're great. <Added>where it says: "mechanical(the difficuly of the chords and struming)" 
and  
"technical(the difficulty of the rhythm)" add "ect" to the end of the words in the parenthesis. I didn't mean to imply that chords and strumming are the only mechanical problems or that rhythm is the only technical problem. Sorry. 
 
  |   
 | 
  | 
 
  
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   01:19 on Saturday, September 2, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   20:20 on Sunday, September 10, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   20:29 on Sunday, September 10, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
	
Re: Tope ten Guitarists 
 
   08:29 on Wednesday, September 13, 2006
 
           
 
  
  
 | 
 
 
 
 | 
| 
 | 
 |