| string v. cork on tenons
	
| 
| 
string v. cork on tenons 
 
   08:37 on Wednesday, July 30, 2008
 
          
 |  |  
|  |  
| 
| 
Re: string v. cork on tenons 
 
   20:49 on Sunday, September 14, 2008
 
          
 |  |  
| 
|  |  
|  the3rdofpicardy
 (5 points)
 | Posted by  the3rdofpicardy
 I recently bought a fox 222, and it has all cork tenons. the only reason given for this was that god made cork and man made string, and what man is better than god? Its not really a factual basis for having cork tenons over strings, but it works. I had the bassoon checked over my a technician near me who prefers sting tenons because he believed it was more strucutrally sound. But I do not know for sure which is better. My school bassoon had string tenons, and almost never needed greesed, the cork tenons i have now need greese every time i play, but that is because the tenons are new as of april 2008. 
 
 | 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
Re: string v. cork on tenons 
 
   05:25 on Monday, September 15, 2008
 
          
 |  |  
|  |  
| 
| 
Re: string v. cork on tenons 
 
   16:28 on Thursday, September 25, 2008
 
          
 |  |  
|  |  
| 
| 
Re: string v. cork on tenons 
 
   17:41 on Thursday, September 25, 2008
 
          
 |  |  
|  |  
| 
| 
Re: string v. cork on tenons 
 
   14:52 on Friday, September 26, 2008
 
          
 |  |  
|  |  
| 
| 
Re: string v. cork on tenons 
 
   19:29 on Thursday, February 19, 2009
 
          
 |  |  
| 
|  |  
|  flute_n_bassoon
 (309 points)
 | Posted by  flute_n_bassoon
 I am surprised nobody has pointed this out already, but string on the tenons is useful because when the tenon gets loose, you just wind more string on to it. With a cork, it is necessary to replace the cork. I like to buy my bassoons with cork, then when they wear out, replace the cork with string! 
 
 | 
 |  |  |  
|  |  
 
 
 
 | 
 
  |